Gersh Kuntzman, the New York Post columnist, told me he
was preparing a column on a rite of summer,
the arrival of frogs to Chinatown, by buying some and bringing them
to a friend who ran a restaurant on the Upper West Side, and I asked
if I could tag along. He cheerfully agreed and gave me directions to
his apartment in Park Slope.
I was greeted at the door by a slight man in his mid-30’s, with
freckles, wire-rimmed glasses and curly brown hair.
We went into Mr. Kuntzman’s study. He put a computer into his
knapsack and asked me what my angle was. He’s lately published a
thrown-off book about baldness called Hair!, and I said I
didn’t understand how he could care about the subject when he had so
much hair.
"O.K., just look at this picture–" Mr. Kuntzman handed me a
picture of himself 15 years ago. He had on a black gown and a
mortarboard slanting off a thick mass of hair.
"Is that a wig?" I said.
"No, no. But the picture explains everything. Wait till we get on
the subway."
We were in a hurry, because he had to buy the frogs at the right
moment so he could bring them fresh to his chef friend when the
lunch run was over. Then Mr. Kuntzman’s wife came in from her walk.
Julie Rosenberg is a tall, striking woman with wide cheekbones and
pretty eyes. She warned him not to bring any frogs back to the
house.
On the subway, Mr. Kuntzman described his career. He’d been in
graduate school for Russian literature when he realized that he’d
never get pleasure from seeking out undiscovered writers in the
original Russian, so he quit and got a job at a wrestling magazine
and was soon writing fake letters to the editor about Andre the
Giant, using friends’ names. Before long he was at the
Resident, then the Post.
We got to Mott Street ahead of schedule and checked out the
garbage pails filled with frogs. Mr. Kuntzman rummaged intently in
the muck. He’d done most of his legwork already and had been told
two tricks of how to pick a good frog. But we had time to kill, so
we went around the corner and sat down for a lemonade.
I asked him about the picture in his study.
"O.K., the guy in that picture was a nebbish. An undateable
nebbish," he said. "He’s a funny guy. A nice guy. Everybody likes
the guy. But no one’s sleeping with him. His daily experience in
college was the same social-outcast thing that bald guys experience.
So I could sympathize."
"Well, how did you get your wife?" I said.
"I met her in January 1991 at a party. She was very funny, and I
fell instantly in love with her. Not love at first sight, but love
at first conversation. I was totally smitten. But I was the guy in
that picture. So we were friends for eight months. Totally
platonic."
Mr. Kuntzman sighed as he collapsed back into that terrible
period.
"I always had to run through a war of attrition till women would
be attracted to me," he said. "Eventually, after months of knowing
me, they would be attracted to the whole package."
Mr. Kuntzman was like a character from a Russian short story. I
said that he was self-deprecating to a fault.
"I believe I am genuinely self-deprecating. I’m not proud of a
lot of things. I don’t think what I do is great or even good"–he
leaned forward with a suddenly fierce expression–"but I defy you to
find someone who could have done all the research and all the
writing on that book–70,000 words, start to finish–in two months.
It’s by no means a great book. I wish I had had more time. But I’ll
tell you that it’s not bad. And the typing alone of 300 pages would
take some people a month. Just the typing!"
"Let’s be psychological for a minute."
Mr. Kuntzman shut his eyes. "I have no psychological
insight."
"What do you think of people who do O.K. work, but they think
it’s great?" I said. "I have some friends like that."
"They’re serious assholes."
"All right, fine–they’re assholes. What is a guy who does O.K.
work and says it’s no good?"
Mr. Kuntzman didn’t have to think about it. "The word for that
person is a dick. The difference between an asshole and a dick– and
there is a difference, which is not appreciated–an asshole is
someone who deserves our scorn. But the dick is someone who just
deserves ridicule."
Now I was beginning to see Mr. Kuntzman as a character from an
old Yiddish joke, one of those guys in the old country who insist
that they’re nobodies ….
Mr. Kuntzman told me about an exchange he’d had with a
reader.
"As a writer, you know that most letters you get are handwritten,
and they’re like virulently anti-Semitic. Someone will cut out a
photograph of Ariel Sharon from the Post and circle it and
write, ‘Slimy Jew bastard–die!’ Why they send them to me, I don’t
know. But recently I got this letter from someone who said, ‘I can’t
help it. I love you. You’ve become such an inspiration to me. Now my
life has focus.’ So on.
"I wasn’t sure what to make of it. I’m so reluctant to think of
my work as high-quality. Because I think that anyone who thinks of
their work as being great is extremely obnoxious. I thought this guy
was maybe being sarcastic. So I wrote him back: ‘Listen, I can’t
tell if you’re serious or being sarcastic. Either way, I approve.
But you should know–if you’re being sarcastic, I don’t think it’s
warranted, because I don’t think I’ve put myself out there as the
greatest writer.’
"And this guy wrote back and said, ‘I was not being sarcastic.
Why would you immediately leap to thoughts of sarcasm?’"
Mr. Kuntzman glanced at the clock: 1:45. We jumped up.
The less about the frogs, the better. My father believes that
some people have a Victorian basement, a part of their personality
that is submerged beneath respectability and filled with unspeakable
cruelty. I realize that I have a Victorian basement, and Mr.
Kuntzman probably does, too.
We carried two bags of clubbed, skinned frogs onto the subway. I
told Mr. Kuntzman I wasn’t sure what he was saying about praise and
quality.
"Why does anyone work in the newspaper business? Expenses and
free newspapers is why. It’s easy work, and it’s fun to meet all
these people. It’s embarrassingly untaxing to do what we do. Look at
my fingers–not a callous on them. But you see, I felt that this
reader may have felt that I was putting on airs. A lot of people
interpret self-deprecation in a writer as putting on airs. I think
you must know what I’m trying to say, but it’s not something I’ve
ever put into words."
The ordinarily glib Mr. Kuntzman suddenly became silent, staring
at the subway doors.
"Vincent Price was not a good actor. But he knew that he was not
a good actor, and he was winking at you even while he was chewing
the scenery.
"And"–Mr. Kuntzman’s eyes lit up–"that made him a good actor.
Because he knew he wasn’t a good actor, and he didn’t sit around
saying, ‘I should be doing Hamlet.’ He was in on the joke.
Like I’m in on the joke. Isn’t this a joke? I’m not proud it’s a
joke … but it’s a joke.
"So that’s what bothered me about that reader. If he thought I’m
not in on the joke; if he thought I’m being a self-aggrandizing
asshole."
We left the subway and walked to the Avenue Bistro on Columbus
Avenue. Chef and owner Scott Campbell came out and led us back to
the kitchen. It was crowded, and we had to press ourselves into the
corner as Mr. Campbell, a tall, affable man with red cheeks, chopped
up the frogs’ legs. A blond waitress came by and almost fainted. Mr.
Campbell dumped them in a pot of milk, tossed them in flour, then
sautéed them in olive oil with garlic.
We ate them in the kitchen. Mr. Campbell’s culinary philosophy is
to let the real nature of a protein come through. So these were
really frogs. His wife Linda came up and ate one. "These are
lovely," she said. "They’re sweet and succulent. It’s like halfway
between a poultry and a fish–"
Mr. Kuntzman finished writing his column sitting at a table in
the bistro with his computer, then we walked back through Central
Park to the East Side.
He described some desserts Mr. Campbell made, and I realized how
the guy in the picture in the study looked different from the guy
next to me.
"You used to be heavier," I said.
"Right," Mr. Kuntzman said, as if I had discovered a secret. "I
was 30 pounds heavier, and you know what the difference was?"
"Desserts?"
"Apple juice. That’s the big thing: apple juice. My wife
explained this to me, and you know how recovering alcoholics are
often the biggest proselytizers about liquor? I’m that way about
apple juice. It’s a killer, that apple juice. And it’s a silent
killer, because it hides behind the mask of healthy respectability.
A silent killer."
"You’re not being serious," I said.
Mr. Kuntzman stopped next to the reservoir.
"Yes, I am. It’s a menace, is what it is."
"Well, how much apple juice were you drinking?" I said.
Mr. Kuntzman hemmed and hawed.
"I don’t know, a half gallon–maybe a quart a day. But I am
convinced that apple juice and its seconds, such as Sunny Delight
and other such beverages, are responsible for 90 percent of
childhood obesity. The juice of one apple, you say what can be
harmful about that? An apple a day keeps the doctor away. But 20
apples a day? Eventually that’s 20 pounds."
Mr. Kuntzman could be something of a crank. I was saved by his
beeper. Mr. Kuntzman checked the screen, and it was his wife. I lent
him my cell phone to call her.
"These are totally antisocial, and totally dangerous on the
road," Mr. Kuntzman said, covering his mouth with his hand so no one
would see him using the phone.
He hung up, and we had to go our separate ways. I said in parting
that he’d gotten off some pretty good jokes in his book, and he
nodded, agreeing.
"So you do appreciate some of your lines," I said.
He shrugged. "I’m a writer. If I don’t do it, who’s going
to?"
You may reach Philip Weiss via email at: pweiss@observer.com